Suchergebnisse

For decades, Americans have trusted the Republicans over the Democrats to handle national security issues, by a wide margin. Over the Bush presidency, that gap has disappeared. The authors explore the causes and consequences of this loss and suggest several new avenues for research on issue ownership. Findings indicate that Bush's handling of the Iraq war has played a decisive role in diminishing the Republican Party's reputational advantage on national security. This has had significant electoral repercussions both for the president and his copartisans in Congress. Adapted from the source document.

For decades, Americans have trusted the Republicans over the Democrats to handle national security issues, by a wide margin. Over the Bush presidency, that gap has disappeared. The authors explore the causes and consequences of this loss and suggest several new avenues for research on issue ownership. Findings indicate that Bush's handling of the Iraq war has played a decisive role in diminishing the Republican Party's reputational advantage on national security. This has had significant electoral repercussions both for the president and his copartisans in Congress.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified a number of soil-management strategies that can be implemented to reduce GHG emissions. However, before deciding which of these strategies are most appropriate in any given situation, it

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified a number of soil-management strategies that can be implemented to reduce GHG emissions. However, before deciding which of these strategies are most appropriate in any given situation, it

Chapter 1. Bridging the Ggap. Experiments in the Heart of the Transition Zone (Mackinson and Holm) -- Chapter 2. Knowledge for Fisheries Governance. Participation, Integration and Institutional Reform (Linke et al) -- Chapter 3. Fishermen and Scientists in the Same Boat. A Story of Collaboration in the UK South Devon Crab Fishery (Pearson, et al.) -- Chapter 4. Getting Choosy About Whitefish in Lake Vättern. Using Participatory Approaches to Improve Fisheries Selectivity (Sandström, et al.) -- Chapter 5. Understanding Fishermen-Scientist Collaboration in Galician Small-Scale Fisheries (NW Spain). Validating a Methodological Toolbox Through a Process-Oriented Approach (Vidal, et al.) -- Chapter 6. Information is the Jam of the Western Baltic Herring Sandwich. Bridging Gaps Between Policy, Stakeholders and Science (Clausen, et al.) -- Chapter 7. Aiming for By-Catch. Collaborative Monitoring of Rare and Migratory Species in the Wadden Sea (Wätjen and Ramírez-Monsalve) -- Chapter 8. The Italian Job. Navigating the (Im)perfect Storm of Participatory Fisheries Research in the Northern Adriatic Sea (Raicevich, et al.) -- Chapter 9. Trapped in the TAC Machine. Making a Fisheries Based Indicator System for Coastal Cod in Steigen, Norway (Holm, et al.) -- Chapter 10. When Fishermen Take Charge. The Development of a Management Plan for the Red Shrimp Fishery in Mediterranean Spain (Bjørkan, et al.) -- Chapter 11. Does Slow-Burn Collaboration Deliver Results? Towards Collaborative Development Multiannual Multispecies Management Plans in North Sea Mixed Demersal Fisheries (Mackinson, et al.) -- Chapter 12. Action Research in Tropical Tuna Purse Seine Fisheries. Thoughts and Perspectives (Airaud, et al.) -- Chapter 13. From Planning for Society to Planning with Society. Integration of Coastal Fisheries into the Maritime Spatial Planning (Aps, et al.) -- Chapter 14. Implementing the Landing Obligation. An Analysis of the Gap Between Fishers and Policy Makers in the Netherlands (Kraan and Verweij) -- Chapter 15. Taking the Initiative on Maltese Trawl Industry Management. Industry and Science Collaboration on Identifying Nursery and Spawning Areas for Trawl Fisheries Target Species (Martin) -- Chapter 16. People, Sharks and Science. What can it take for Industry-led Research to make a Difference to the Management of Elasmobranchs of Conservation Concern in UK waters? (Hetherington and Bendall) -- Chapter 17. Bridging Gaps, Reforming Fisheries (Holm, et al.) -- Chapter 18. Conclusion (Mackinson, et al.). .

The debate around humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect generally concerns a collective action problem on the international level: motivating states to participate in a multilateral coalition to stop a mass atrocity. This debate presupposes that states enjoy a domestic consensus about their rights and responsibilities to intervene. This article reconsiders this assumption and examines the sources of domestic political will for intervention, particularly the role of partisanship, ideology, and public opinion on Congressional members' willingness to support US intervention for humanitarian purposes. We analyze several Congressional votes relevant to four episodes of US humanitarian intervention: Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo. We find that public support for humanitarian intervention increases Congressional support and that other political demands, primarily partisanship and ideological distance from the president, often trump the normative exigencies of intervention. Our findings shed light on the domestic political dynamics behind humanitarian intervention and can help explain why some recent humanitarian missions have proceeded without seeking Congressional approval. Adapted from the source document.